I just read the story on the BCS in SI this week. I'm left confused. If the bowls are the ones rolling in money and the schools barely break even, why do the presidents let it continue? They are leaving massive money on the table by letting the bowls dictate the system. I understand that the coaches and AD's get bonuses for bowl appearances, but we've been led to believe that the presidents support the BCS. Why? This article makes it plain that the schools are being screwed while the bowls swim in money. Something doesn't add up. Why are the presidents maintaining the status quo? I need help on this.
S
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment